Cancer and Agent Orange

Last Updated‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎

Written by

Table of Contents

Between the years of 1962-1971, American troops dumped more than 19 million gallons of herbicide on vegetation in lands around Vietnam, Laos, and nearby areas, in order to remove forest cover and to destroy crops. The herbicide most commonly used was Agent Orange, named for the orange-striped barrels containing the poison. Agent Orange was a compound of two phenoxy herbicides: 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacid (2,4-D), and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T). While other types of herbicides were used, such as cacadylic acid and picloram, Agent Orange refers generally to all the phenoxy herbicides sprayed at the time.

When a study in 1970 found that 2,4,5-T caused birth defects in lab rats, the military ceased to use 2,4,5-T on Vietnam. A year later, all use of herbicide in Vietnam ended. But the damage was already done. As veterans began coming home from Vietnam in the mid-1970’s, numerous health complaints arose. Among those health issues was—and is—cancer.

The National Toxicology Program and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have both identified 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, or TCDD, as “known to be a human carcinogen”. The main dioxin in Agent Orange is TCDD.

Federal Regulations have been put into effect in order to facilitate the identification of veterans as service connected for cancers caused by Agent Orange. The following regulations, 38 CFR 3.309 and 38 CFR 3.307, are explained the subsequent paragraphs.

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 38, Section 3.309 (e)

If a veteran was exposed to an herbicide agent during active military service, naval, or air service, the following diseases shall be considered service-connected if the requirements of 3.307 (a)(6) are met even though there is no record of such disease during service, provided further that the rebuttable presumption provisions of 3.307(d) are also satisfied. (The following list reflects only cancerous diseases.)

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 38, Section 3.307 (e)

This section dictates the conditions under which veterans can be presumed to be service-connected for chronic, tropical or prisoner-of-war related, or disease associated with exposure to certain herbicide agent (wartime and service on or after January 1, 1947). In this case, the disease in question is Agent Orange. The following points provide a brief overview of conditions referenced earlier:

§3.307 (a)(6)

  1. A chronic, tropical, prisoner of war related disease, or a disease associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents will be considered to have been incurred in or aggravated by service even though there is no evidence of such disease during the period of service.
  2. In order to be considered as having service-connected diseases, veterans must have served for 90 days or more during a war period or after December 31, 1946.
  3. Veterans who served in the Republic of Vietnam between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975 in the active military, naval, or air force, is presumed to have been exposed to an herbicide agent, unless there is affirmative evidence that the veteran was not exposed to any such agent during said service.
  4. The term “herbicide agent” means a chemical in an herbicide used in support of the United States and allied military operations in the Republic of Vietnam during the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975, specifically: 2,4-D; 2,4,5-T and its contaminant TCDD; cacodylic acid; and picloram.
  5. Service in the Republic of Vietnam includes waters offshore.
  6. Diseases (listed in 3.309e) incurred during service shall have become manifest to a degree of 10 percent or more at any time after service, with the exception of chloracne and acneform-related diseases.
  7. Diseases (listed in 3.309e) contracted during service are considered chronic, even though diagnosed as acute because of insidious inception and chronic development. The exceptions are diseases that were the result of intercurrent causes, drug ingestion , or a complication of some other condition not related to service.

§3.307(d)

  1. Evidence that the disease was not incurred in service is any evidence that sufficiently supports that the disease was contracted outside of service, and medical judgment will be exercised in making the determination of whether or not the disease is the effect of intercurrent disease or injury.
  2. Evidence that the disease was not aggravated by service is any affirmative evidence that the preexisting condition was aggravated by an intercurrent disease or by injury unrelated to service, or that the increase of disability was due to natural progression of the preexisting condition.

Written by

More Articles

News and advice about the VA, disability ratings and benefits.

Testimonials

Supporting Veterans Nationwide

  • State-NC

    Thank you to the firm of Hill & Ponton!! Brian Hill and his staff were able to get my 100% disability with the VA for my exposure to herbicides in Thailand. I have been fighting for this for many years and kept getting denied, after consulting with Hill & Ponton I decided to let them help me and it was the best decision I could have made. I found their professionalism to be outstanding.

    – Chip P.

    North Carolina

  • State-IL

    They got my disability rating after I was denied twice. They knew exactly how to format and submit the claim. I was rated 50%, Hill & Ponton weren’t done, they found other medical that related to exposure and submitted additional claims. I could not have received a disability rating without Hill & Ponton. If you need help, choose Hill & Ponton.

    – Thomas D.

    Illinois

  • State-FL

    The service provided by Hill and Ponton was exemplary. The lawyers and staff took care of every aspect with respect and understanding of the clients needs. In my case, as a new widow, they patiently walked me through each step. They kept me informed of the progress. I cannot say enough about the service they provided. Thank you Brian and staff.

    – Judith K Zitzewitz

    Florida

  • State-IN

    As a Vet you may have filed a disability claim, and if you want to win your claim you need to call Hill and Ponton. I didn’t know what to do about my condition or status until I made the call. At H&P they not only took my case, but made me feel like family. They changed my life and they will change your life too. It’s true! In my opinion you can’t do better and you won’t regret it!

    – Paul K

     Indiana

About us v1 1

ABOUT US

About Hill & Ponton

Learn about the VA disability law firm, champions for veterans since 1986.