Some VA disability claims feel impossible to win, even when a veteran knows their condition started during or after service. In many cases, the barrier is not a lack of honesty or effort. It is the VA’s rules. Certain claims simply cannot be granted under the law because they do not qualify as disabilities the VA can rate. Others fail because the claim is built on symptoms or findings that do not meet the VA’s definition of a compensable condition. 

At the same time, some claims only seem unprovable. These claims may be denied at first because key evidence is missing, unclear, or presented in a way the VA does not accept. In these cases, the underlying problem is not the condition itself, but how the claim is framed. Most claims that appear “unprovable” fall into one of three categories: 

  • Claims the VA is legally barred from awarding under current regulations 
  • Claims for conditions the VA does not consider disabilities, such as lab results or risk factors 
  • Claims that lack the specific type of evidence the VA requires, even though the condition is real 

Knowing which category your situation fits into helps you decide what to do next. Some claims must be reframed under a different diagnosis, some require stronger medical support, and some need a new approach such as secondary service connection. The path forward becomes much clearer once you understand why the VA sees the claim as one it “cannot” approve. 

Claims Not Meeting Eligibility Requirements 

Some VA disability claims cannot move forward because they do not meet the VA’s basic requirements for establishing service connection. These rules apply to every claim and form the starting point for whether the VA can consider the condition at all. A claim fails the eligibility stage when one of the following elements is missing: 

  • A clear, current medical diagnosis – The VA requires a present disability identified by a medical professional. Generally, symptoms alone do not qualify, and past problems must still exist today to be considered. However, pain without a diagnosis can be considered a disability if it causes functional impairment.  
  • Evidence that something happened during service – A claim must point to an in-service event, injury, exposure, or onset of symptoms. Without this, the VA has nothing to connect the current condition back to military service. 
  • A medical link between the condition and service – Even with a diagnosis and a documented event, the VA needs medical evidence showing the two are related. This link is called a nexus, and the VA cannot grant service connection without it. 

When one of these foundational pieces is missing, the VA cannot evaluate the claim further. Fixing problems at this stage usually requires gathering medical records, clarifying the timeline of symptoms, or securing a medical opinion that explains how the condition connects to service. 

No current diagnosis 

A VA disability claim cannot be approved without a current medical diagnosis. The VA uses the diagnosis as the anchor for the entire claim. Without it, the VA has no confirmed condition to evaluate, no way to measure severity, and nothing to connect back to service. A diagnosis must meet three standards: 

  • It must be made by a qualified medical professional. Self-reported symptoms, even when persistent, are not enough. The VA relies on medical records, not personal observation alone. 
  • It must reflect a present disability. Past injuries or old illnesses do not qualify unless they still cause measurable problems today. The VA has to see that the condition continues to affect the veteran’s health. 
  • It must be identifiable and documented. Vague notations like “pain,” “fatigue,” or “trouble sleeping” do not count as diagnoses. The VA needs a clear medical label tied to the condition. 

When a claim lacks a current diagnosis, the VA cannot rate the disability or link it to service. The solution usually involves getting updated medical evaluations, requesting specialist exams, or ensuring the condition is recorded clearly in recent treatment notes. A well-documented diagnosis gives the VA the foundation it needs to move the claim forward. 

Pre-existing conditions 

A pre-existing condition can block a VA disability claim when the evidence shows the condition existed before service and did not permanently worsen while the veteran was in uniform. The VA focuses on whether military service caused a lasting change, not just short-term flareups or temporary symptoms. A claim involving a pre-existing condition becomes difficult when: 

  • Entrance exams or early service records document the condition. If the condition is clearly noted at the start of service, the VA presumes it was already present. 
  • There is no evidence of a permanent increase in severity during service. Symptoms that come and go are not considered aggravation unless they lead to a long-term change in the condition’s course. 
  • Service records show no treatment, complaints, or decline. When nothing in the record demonstrates a shift in severity, the VA assumes the condition remained stable. 

To move these claims forward, evidence must show that military service caused a meaningful and lasting increase in severity. This often requires medical opinions, long-term treatment records, or documentation showing that service demands created a measurable worsening of the condition. Without that proof, the VA will deny the claim based on its pre-service origin. 

Congenital or Genetic  Diseases 

Congenital and geneticdiseases are present from birth, which makes them different from typical pre-existing conditions that develop before service but later in life.  Examples may include, but are not limited to, polycystic kidney disease, sickle cell disease, retinitis pigmentosa, and Huntington’s chorea. The VA treats these conditions as structural or inherited traits rather than disabilities caused by military service. A claim involving a congenital or genetic condition cannot be approved when: 

  • The condition has no evidence of permanent worsening during service. The VA requires clear proof that military duties caused the condition to advance beyond its natural progression. 
  • Medical records show a stable pattern over time. If service-era records look similar to post-service evaluations, the VA concludes that service did not aggravate the condition. 

For these conditions, the VA draws a sharp line between the part of the disability the veteran was born with and any worsening that occurred because of service. To succeed, a veteran must present medical evidence showing that the demands, exposures, or injuries of military life caused a noticeable and lasting increase in severity. Without that type of documented aggravation, the VA will deny the claim because the underlying condition is considered congenital or genetic in origin. 

Note that congenital or development defects, which include refractive error of the eye, personality disorders, and mental deficiency are generally not considered diseases or injuries that can be service-connected.  

Disabilities due to a veteran’s own willful misconduct 

The VA does not grant disability compensation for conditions caused directly by a veteran’s own willful misconduct. In VA terms, this means actions the veteran chose to engage in that led to injury, illness, or long-term health problems. When the VA identifies willful misconduct as the primary cause, the claim becomes ineligible for service connection. A claim may fall into this category when: 

  • The condition results from substance abuse without a medical link to another disability. Alcohol or drug abuse cannot be compensated on its own, even when the veteran experienced serious health consequences. 
  • Evidence shows intentional or reckless behavior caused the disability. Injuries from actions that violated military rules or safety protocols may be treated as misconduct cases. 
  • There is no service-connected condition explaining or contributing to the behavior. If the misconduct occurred independently of any service-related medical issue, the VA considers it the sole cause. 

However, the VA makes an important distinction: if the misconduct was caused by a service-connected condition (such as PTSD or depression), the resulting disability may still be considered. In those cases, the misconduct is not treated as the original cause. This requires strong evidence of a medical link between the veteran’s service-connected condition and the behavior in question. 

Other Conditions the VA Doesn’t Rate 

Some conditions cannot be proven as disabilities because the VA does not classify them as ratable diseases or injuries. In these cases, the problem is not the veteran’s symptoms but the fact that the VA treats the issue as a finding, risk factor, or circumstance rather than a disability that causes functional loss. When a condition falls into this category, the VA will deny the claim even if the veteran’s symptoms are real. A claim may fall into this group when: 

  • The condition is a laboratory or clinical finding rather than a disease. Abnormal results alone do not qualify for compensation unless they point to an underlying, diagnosable disorder. 
  • The VA considers the condition a secondary effect or contributing factor. Some issues function as indicators of health risk, not as stand-alone disabilities. 

In these situations, the path forward involves identifying a medically recognized condition that explains or results from the non-ratable issue. Once the underlying disability is identified, the veteran can pursue service connection using that diagnosis instead of the non-ratable finding. 

Hyperlipidemia (High Cholesterol) 

Hyperlipidemia is one of the most common reasons a claim gets denied, not because the condition is unimportant, but because the VA does not treat it as a disability. High cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, and abnormal lipid levels are considered laboratory findings. They show that something is happening in the body, but they are not disabilities the VA can rate on their own. A claim for hyperlipidemia is unprovable if: 

  • There is no underlying disease tied to the abnormal lab results. The VA needs a diagnosable condition, such as heart disease or hypertension, before it can evaluate how the issue affects health. 
  • The claim is framed as the cholesterol level itself. Since the VA cannot assign a rating to a lab number, the claim stops at the eligibility stage. 
  • Medical records show abnormal levels without associated symptoms or impairment. Without a diagnosable disorder, high cholesterol remains a risk factor instead of a disability. 

Veterans can move these claims forward by identifying a ratable condition linked to their elevated lipid levels. This may include coronary artery disease, certain heart disorders, or other illnesses connected to metabolic changes. Once a diagnosis is established, the veteran can pursue service connection for the underlying disease rather than the lab result. 

Infertility 

Infertility cannot be rated as a disability on its own because the VA views it as a symptom or outcome of another medical condition rather than a stand-alone disorder While infertility can create significant personal and emotional challenges, the VA’s rating system requires a diagnosable disease or injury that causes the infertility before compensation can be considered. A claim for infertility is difficult to prove when: 

  • There is no underlying diagnosis explaining the loss of fertility. Without a medical condition tied to the infertility, the VA has nothing it can rate. 
  • Medical records describe infertility only as a clinical finding. A finding alone does not qualify unless it is connected to a disability recognized by the VA. 
  • The claim focuses on fertility status instead of the disease or injury that caused it. The VA compensates the root condition, not the reproductive outcome. 

Many veterans can still move forward by identifying the medical issue responsible for the infertility. Conditions such as prostate cancer, endometriosis, hormonal disorders, or injuries may serve as the ratable foundation. Once that condition is diagnosed and connected to service, infertility becomes a compensable effect of the underlying disability rather than a claim by itself. You may also qualify for Special Monthly Compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ.  

Obesity 

The VA does not treat obesity as a disability, even when it contributes to serious health problems. Instead, the VA classifies obesity as a condition that may lead to or worsen other disabilities but cannot be rated on its own. A claim that lists obesity as the primary disability cannot be approved if: 

  • It is presented as the disability itself instead of a contributing factor. 
  • There is no medical evidence showing a disease caused or aggravated the weight gain. Without a service-connected illness or condition triggering obesity, the VA cannot link it to military service. 
  • The claim lacks a secondary condition tied to the weight change. Health problems such as sleep apnea, diabetes, or joint disorders must be identified and diagnosed before they can be rated. 

The VA does however recognize obesity as an “intermediate step” in secondary service connection. This means obesity that was caused by a service-connected disability and in turn caused a new disability can be used as evidence in establishing service connection for the resulting condition, even though obesity itself cannot be compensated. 

What Makes a VA Disability Claim Hard to Prove? 

Some VA disability claims are harder to prove because they fall into areas where the evidence is naturally more complex or harder to document. These claims do not fail due to technical mistakes or missing paperwork alone. Instead, the challenge comes from the nature of the condition itself and how the VA evaluates medical evidence. A claim tends to require more effort when: 

  • The condition doesn’t have a single, clear cause. Illnesses involving multiple factors or uncertain origins require stronger medical explanation to show how service played a role. 
  • The symptoms do not follow a simple timeline. Conditions that develop slowly or appear in patterns make it harder to show when they began or how they progressed. 
  • The disability relies heavily on subjective experience. When the condition cannot be measured through standard tests, the VA depends more on narrative evidence and medical interpretation. 
  • The medical community has limited understanding of the condition. Some disabilities are difficult to diagnose or classify, which makes connecting them to service more complicated. 

Claims in these categories are not impossible to prove, but they demand clearer explanations, well-supported medical opinions, and strong personal or expert evidence. Understanding why a condition is harder to document helps veterans shape their claim in a way the VA can evaluate more effectively. 

Common Obstacles in Proving a VA Claim 

Even when a condition qualifies for service connection, veterans often face practical problems that weaken the evidence. These obstacles do not reflect the strength of the claim itself. Instead, they highlight gaps in documentation or records that make it harder for the VA to see a clear path from service to the current disability. Common hurdles include: 

  • Missing or incomplete service records. Moves, deployments, medical backlogs, and record losses can leave a veteran without documentation that an event or injury occurred. 
  • No formal report of the illness or injury during service. Many veterans chose not to seek treatment while serving, which leaves no entry in their military medical file. 
  • Significant delays in seeking medical care after discharge. When symptoms go untreated for long periods, it becomes harder to show the condition has been continuous since service. 
  • Gaps or inconsistencies in treatment records. Irregular care may create confusion about how long the condition has existed or how severe it has become. 
  • Conditions the VA cannot verify through objective testing. Disabilities that rely heavily on reported symptoms may require additional narrative or medical support. 

These obstacles do not make a claim unwinnable, but they do require a more structured approach. Veterans can often overcome these barriers by adding lay statements, gathering outside medical records, or securing detailed medical opinions that clarify the missing pieces. 

What Disability Claims Are the Hardest to Prove? 

Some disability claims are harder to prove because the evidence needed to support them does not fit neatly into the VA’s system. These conditions often lack a clear cause, reliable testing methods, or consistent documentation. As a result, veterans must rely more heavily on medical opinions and detailed personal evidence to show how the disability began and how it continues to affect daily life. 

  • Gulf War Illness is one of the clearest examples. Veterans may develop clusters of symptoms with no single diagnosis or confirmed explanation. Because medical tests often appear normal, the challenge comes from proving that the condition exists and connecting it to service in the Gulf War region. 
  • Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia create similar difficulties. These conditions involve patterns of severe fatigue, pain, and cognitive problems that cannot be measured through scans or lab work. Their symptoms rise and fall over time, which makes it essential to show a long trail of medical documentation to demonstrate severity. 
  • Military sexual trauma (MST) claims can also be hard to develop because many incidents are never reported. Without direct service records describing the event, veterans must rely on indirect evidence, such as behavior changes, mental health evaluations, or statements from people who knew them at the time. 
  • Non-combat PTSD presents a different challenge. The diagnosis may be clear, but the VA must verify the specific traumatic event. When the stressor is not documented in military records, the veteran must provide consistent statements and any available corroborating evidence. 
  • Tinnitus and many mental health conditions depend heavily on the veteran’s own reporting. Tinnitus has no objective test. Mental health symptoms may shift over time, appear years after service, or be recorded inconsistently. These claims require descriptions of how symptoms began and how they impact daily functioning. 
  • Hearing loss becomes difficult when audiometric results do not meet the VA’s rating thresholds. A veteran may experience real problems understanding speech, but if the test scores fall outside the compensable range, the VA cannot assign a rating. 
  • Musculoskeletal conditions, such as knee locking, shoulder instability, or back pain without visible structural damage, are also hard to prove. Imaging may appear normal even when pain or limited movement is severe. In these cases, detailed clinical exams and long-term treatment notes carry more weight than scans. 

These  claims are not impossible to prove. They simply require stronger medical detail, clearer narrative evidence, and consistent documentation. When the condition cannot be shown through standard tests, the veteran must build a record that explains what those tests cannot capture. 

Proving an Unprovable Disability Claim 

Some claims feel unprovable because the evidence does not fit neatly into the VA’s system. In these situations, the goal is not to start over. It is to strengthen the claim by presenting the information the VA relies on most. Even complex or unusual conditions can be proven when the evidence is organized in a way that shows a clear pattern from service to the present. Veterans can improve difficult claims by: 

  • Building a consistent record over time. Regular treatment notes, updated evaluations, and specialist input help show stability and severity. 
  • Presenting a clear, chronological story. A well-organized timeline helps the VA understand when symptoms began and how they progressed. 
  • Using multiple forms of supporting evidence. Statements, private medical records, expert opinions, and functional descriptions can work together to create a stronger claim. 

The goal is to create a clearer picture, not to overwhelm the VA with more documents. Good evidence tells a simple, direct story that helps the VA understand what cannot be shown through a single test or record. 

Understand Why the VA Thinks It Cannot Be Proven 

The VA bases every decision on specific evidence rules. When one of those pieces does not appear in the file (or appears unclear) the VA considers the claim unproven. This may happen when: 

  • Key evidence is not present in the VA’s copy of the file. Missing service records or private treatment notes can make the condition appear unsupported. 
  • The VA sees a break in the timeline. If the symptoms appear years after service, the VA needs stronger explanation to connect them. 
  • Medical statements do not address the questions VA examiners must answer. If a provider describes the condition but does not explain its relationship to service, the VA cannot rely on the opinion. 
  • The VA cannot see how the condition began. When the record shows a diagnosis but not the cause, the VA cannot assume the link. 

Understanding the VA’s reasoning shows the veteran exactly which part of the claim needs clarification. Once those missing pieces are identified, the veteran can gather the type of evidence that addresses the VA’s specific concerns. 

Use Lay Evidence to Fill the Gaps 

Lay evidence can strengthen a claim when medical or service records do not tell the full story. The VA accepts credible statements from the veteran and others who witnessed symptoms, behaviors, or changes over time. These statements help explain details that may never appear in official documents, especially when an injury was not reported or early symptoms went untreated. Lay evidence is useful when: 

  • Symptoms began during service but were never documented. A veteran’s statement can describe the first appearance of pain, stress, or physical limitations. 
  • People close to the veteran noticed changes. Family members, friends, or fellow service members can confirm patterns the VA cannot see from records alone. 
  • Daily life is affected in ways medical notes do not capture. Descriptions of mobility issues, sleep problems, or mental health struggles help the VA understand functional impact. 
  • Service-related events were never formally reported. For unreported injuries or traumatic experiences, lay evidence can provide a consistent account of what happened. 

The strength of lay evidence comes from detail and clarity. Statements should describe what was observed, when it occurred, and how it affected the veteran. When written carefully, these statements bridge the gaps in documentation and give the VA a fuller picture of the disability. 

Get a Good Medical Opinion 

A strong medical opinion can be one of the most important tools for proving a difficult VA disability claim. The VA relies heavily on professional medical judgment when the cause of a condition is unclear or when the records do not tell the entire story. A well-prepared opinion helps connect the veteran’s current diagnosis to events, exposures, or duties from their time in service. A helpful medical opinion will: 

  • Address the exact question the VA must answer. The opinion should explain whether the condition is “at least as likely as not” related to service, using clear medical reasoning. 
  • Review the veteran’s service and medical history. A doctor must show they considered the timeline, symptoms, and relevant records before reaching a conclusion. 
  • Explain how the condition developed. A strong opinion describes the medical process behind the illness or injury, showing why the veteran’s military experience played a meaningful role. 
  • Resolve unclear or missing pieces in the file. When records are incomplete or symptoms developed slowly, a medical expert can clarify how everything fits together. 

Independent medical opinions are especially valuable when VA exam results are brief or do not fully explain the connection to service. A detailed, well-supported opinion gives the VA a clear medical basis to grant a claim that might otherwise appear unprovable. 

Rely on Secondary Service Connection 

Some disabilities are hard to prove directly, but they can still be connected to service through a secondary pathway. Secondary service connection applies when a service-connected condition leads to, worsens, or contributes to another disability. This route can make an “unprovable” claim viable because the VA does not require the second condition to have started during service – only that it resulted from a condition that did. Secondary service connection applies when: 

  • A service-connected condition causes a new disability. For example, chronic knee problems may lead to hip or back issues due to changes in movement or posture. 
  • Medication side effects contribute to another illness. Treatments for service-connected mental health conditions or chronic pain may create new health problems the VA can rate. 
  • A service-connected condition worsens an existing problem. If the original disability accelerates or aggravates another condition, the resulting increase in severity may qualify. 
  • Physical limitations create downstream effects. Reduced mobility, sleep disruption, or long-term pain can lead to secondary conditions that would not have developed otherwise. 

Secondary connections expand the path to approval because they focus on cause-and-effect relationships instead of direct service onset. When supported by medical evidence, this approach gives veterans another way to establish service connection for disabilities that might be impossible to prove through the primary route.  

Hill & Ponton specializes in helping veterans with denied or underrated claims prove their case to the VA and increase their compensation. Contact us for a free evaluation today – we have a 96% success rate for the appeals we handle and don’t charge anything until we win.  

Did the VA Deny Your Disability Claim?

Let our team review your case today!

Get a Free Case Evaluation

Content Reviewed by

Jacqueline Imboden, Sr. Claims Advocate

Jacqueline Imboden, Sr. Claims Advocate Avatar

Jacqueline Imboden joined Hill & Ponton in March 2025, bringing over two decades of experience from the VA, where she led projects related to disability benefit programs, including addressing issues of military exposures. As a military spouse with an extensive background in Veterans Affairs, as well as a Master’s degree in Public Administration and Executive Leadership, she has a deep understanding of the challenges faced by service members, veterans, and their families.

Written by